EGR Awards 2010

3 September 2010

RSS

Betfair, Lads lose legal first round against Dutch govt 17/12/2009

Jon Parker

Betfair, Lads lose legal first round against Dutch govt

THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AG) of Europe’s highest court, the European Court of Justice (ECJ),has provided his opinion in the cases concerning Betfair and Ladbrokes against the Dutch Government before the ECJ in what represents an early stage victory for the monopolies but that poses a threat to  the legality of De Lotto’s automatic appointment as The Netherlands sole egaming supplier. 

The AG’s opinion is not legally binding, but is typically seen as being an indication of the tone of the ECJ’s later, binding decision. 

AG Bot concluded that article 49 of the EC Treaty must be interpreted to mean that “the principle of equal treatment and the transparency requirement that flows from it also applies to the gambling sector in the context of a single license regime,” implicitly challenging De Lotto’s right to act as The Netherlands’ sole legal supplier of online gaming, online sports bets and the national lottery without having to compete in a tender process against EU-licensed lottery providers. 

However Bot did not challenge the legality of a state enforced monopoly per se

Ladbrokes’ managing director of remote betting and gaming John O'Reilly said: " We continue to believe that the ECJ should uphold principles of free and fair competition across borders as there is no logic in the fact that the Dutch monopoly could freely compete against us in the UK but we are prevented from accepting bets from any Dutch resident that finds us on the Internet.” 

Sigrid Ligné, Secretary General of lobby group the European Gaming and Betting Association (EGBA), which represents operators Bet-at-home, Bwin, Digibet, Expekt, Interwetten, PartyGaming and Unibet, said: “This is a key question for the Court given that the exclusive licence has repeatedly been handed out to De Lotto without any form of tender.” 

Chris Bryant, a partner at the Brussels office of law firm Berwin Leighton Paisner, said: “This is round one to the monopolies.”

April Carr, an associate in the EU competition and regulatory team at law firm Olswang said: "This will be disappointing for those online operators who thought they could rely on EU law to liberalise the gaming markets. If the opinion is followed by the European Courts then there is reduced scope for them opening markets."

The case continues and a judgement is expected next year.

Don't miss out on egaming news: sign up for our free, daily Snapshot email. Or get the news as its breaks with the free eGaming Review RSS feed.

Posted: 17/12/2009

User comments

Adonis

About Time someone or some Body clipped Betfair's wings. This is the company which has so much respect for Free Speech that it bars ITS OWN CUSTOMERS, regularly, from posting on its Virtual Monopoly "Forum" - thus suppressing any and all comment which betfair doesn;t like.

» Report this comment

Anonymous

You have to be nuts if you think the private companies are doing all this legal battle and lobbying because they are worried of the bettors' well being and the way monopolies "exploit" them. =) The only thing the private companies care is profit and creating more value fore their shareholders.

» Report this comment

Anonymous

adonis - you are so stupid. When every country in Europe has state monopolies with 10% rake and no competition you'll wish operators like Betfair and Ladbrokes had lobbied harder for a free market

» Report this comment

Post a comment

Subscribe today!

Sign up today to receive two free trial issues of eGaming Review; the online gaming industry's market-leading monthly magazine.